ALL CITATIONS

• Partnerships implementing ecosystem-based moose management in Sweden, International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management 10(3),
  DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2014.936508
  
  
• Wildlife in the cloud: A new approach for engaging stakeholders in wildlife management, Ambio 44(S4),
  DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0706-0
  
  
• Green infrastructure maintenance is more than land cover: Large herbivores limit recruitment of key-stone tree species in Sweden, Landscape and Urban Planning
  DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.07.019
  
  
• Reconciling local control with appropriate scale in Norwegian moose management, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 19(2),
  DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1188371
  
  
• Optimal management of two ecologically interacting deer species-reality matters, beliefs don't, Natural Resource Modeling 30(4),
  DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/nrm.12137
  
  
• Disrupted trophic interactions affect recruitment of boreal deciduous and coniferous trees in northern Europe, Ecological Applications 27(4),
  DOI: http://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1506
  
  
• Integrated spatially-explicit models predict pervasive risks to recolonizing wolves in Scandinavia from human-driven mortality, Biological Conservation
  DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2018.07.025
  
  
• Mapping social-ecological systems to understand the challenges underlying wildlife management, Environmental Science & Policy
  DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.03.007
  
  
• Shaking Hands: Balancing Tensions in the Swedish Forested Landscape, Conservation and Society 17(4),
  DOI: http://doi.org/10.4103/cs.cs_18_112
  
  
• Effects of carnivore presence on hunting lease pricing in South Sweden, Forest Policy and Economics
  DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.05.028
  
  
• How stakeholder representatives cope with collaboration in the Swedish moose management system, Human Dimensions of Wildlife 25(2),
  DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2019.1698081
  
  
• Impact of a recolonizing, cross-border carnivore population on ungulate harvest in Scandinavia, Scientific Reports 10(1),
  DOI: http://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-78585-8
  
  
• Moose Management Strategies under Changing Legal and Institutional Frameworks, Sustainability 12(20),
  DOI: http://doi.org/10.3390/su12208482
  
  
• What influences hunting participation of potential new hunters? Qualitative insights from Sweden, Wildlife Biology 2020(4),
  DOI: http://doi.org/10.2981/wlb.00721
  
  
• Evaluating the outcomes of collaborative wildlife governance: The role of social-ecological system context and collaboration dynamics, Land Use Policy
  DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105028
  
  
• Wildlife conflicts: wolves vs. moose, European Review of Agricultural Economics
  DOI: http://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbaa007
  
  
• Perceived adaptive capacity within a multi-level governance setting: The role of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital, Environmental Science & Policy
  DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.11.011
  
  
• Who does the moose belong to? – Legitimation of collective psychological ownership, Journal of Rural Studies
  DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.05.014
  
  
• The impact of lynx and wolf on roe deer hunting benefits in Sweden, Environmental Economics and Policy Studies
  DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-020-00299-y
  
  
• A view through the lens of policy formulation: the struggle to formulate Swedish moose policy, Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning
  DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.1888700
  
  
• Achieving Social and Ecological Outcomes in Collaborative Environmental Governance: Good Examples from Swedish Moose Management, Sustainability 13(4),
  DOI: http://doi.org/10.3390/su13042329